Bringing smart people to Canada can only make us better

Can we entice India’s brightest young academic stars to do their graduate work at McGill or UBC instead of Stanford or UCLA?
Stephen Toope (who is just back from India where he was heading a delegation of Canadian universities) and Arvind Gupta (The founder of the hugely successful GlobaLink) are surely trying to keep Canada in the game.

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

Henry Yu: Why Macleans and racism should no longer define Canada

“Our society no longer looks like the beer drinking all-white camaraderie of a Molson Canadian commercial. Perhaps it never did, and white supremacy always needed to hide away into reservations and ghettos all those who did not fit into the vision of “White Canada Forever”, which white supremacists sang a century ago.”

Read full article by Henri Yu, Professor of history at the University of British Columbia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Can we convince the US to fund Canadian science?

Yes we can! and even more so with the Obama administration:

“We also need to work with our friends around the world. Science, technology, and innovation proceed more rapidly and more cost-effectively when insights, costs, and risks are shared; and so many of the challenges that science and technology will help us meet are global in character… That is why my administration is ramping up participation in – and our commitment to – international science and technology cooperation across the many areas where it is clearly in our interest to do so.” Obama’s address to the National Academy of Science

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

Running for a second term on the BoG? Yes I should!

I am finishing my 3-year term representing the faculty on the UBC Board of Governors. The elections of new faculty representatives will start on November 25th. The other faculty rep., Andrew Irvine (from Philosophy) is finishing his second term and is not eligible to run again. Faced with the prospect of having no continuity, no institutional memory, no Board experience, and no historical perspective in the faculty representation, I eventually decided to run for a second term.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | Leave a comment

No Stephen O, the university can never live off its land

Stephen Owen, UBC’s vice-president, external, legal and community relations, is a man of high integrity, credibility, and respect, with whom I agree on most issues.  I however, happen to fundamentally disagree with some of his premises in his latest article in the Vancouver Sun, in defense of the new UBC land use plan.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors, UBC Housing Action Plan | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

In memoriam: Richard Kane, 1944 – 2010


Richard Kane passed away on October 1, 2010. He was a very dear friend, a friendship that was based on a common purpose of making Canadian Mathematics a major player on the international scene. His distinguished research career, his incredible dedication to the community over the last 25 years and his unique and defining role in its emergence over the last 15 years, makes our loss too difficult to bear. Many of us relied on his strong serene integrity, all the way till the last days of his life. I spoke regularly with him on the phone since he was diagnosed with cancer in January 2010, and I was utterly overwhelmed and humbled by the serenity and dignity with which he faced his last challenge.  I later learned that he was the one who nominated me for the David Borwein Distinguished Career Award, and that he was planning to come to Vancouver for the ceremony in December 2010. A trip that he will not make, and an event that will prove difficult to celebrate without his gentle presence.
Continue reading

Posted in Honouring friends | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

As promised in the 2010 federal budget

The government has just announced a six person panel to lead a comprehensive review of all (Canadian) federal programs in support of business R&D (as promised in the 2010 budget). Our own Arvind Gupta (MITACS Director) is on the panel which consists of:
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

What is Bill 20?

On June 24th, the Government of B.C. passed a new legislation that will have a major impact on UBC’s Vancouver campus. Bill 20 transfers the responsibility for approving land use plans for the bulk of UBC’s Vancouver campus lands from the Metro Vancouver regional government (GVRD) to the Minister of Community and Rural Development, who will consult with the Minister of Advanced Education and Labour Market Development.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors, UBC Housing Action Plan | 1 Comment

Recent and future Fields medalists

These photos were taken during a mathematics graduate summer school organised by Wilfrid Gangbo (Geogia Tech) in Benin, Africa during the period June 25-July 04, 2010. Courses were given by Cedric Villani (U. de Paris, who was later awarded the Fields medal in Hyderabad, India), Sir John Ball (Oxford), Luis Caffarelli (Austin, Texas), and myself.
Continue reading

Posted in Honouring friends | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What a difference a year makes

Last year’s cuts to the research granting councils, though relatively small, were magnified by their inclusion in a so-called “stimulus budget” full of spending increases in other areas.

This year, the opposite is true. Funding increases, though relatively small, are made more significant by the context of spending restraint evidenced elsewhere in the budget.

At least in part, this decision is due to the efforts of researchers who made themselves heard. Whether by signing the “don’t leave Canada behind” petition or through other efforts, researchers told the government that supporting research is important. Kudos to the government for listening.
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

Another podium we need to own

Budget 2010 is a good start for Canada to own the podium for beautiful minds

Cuts to funding for basic research in last year’s federal budget caused angst and trepidation in the scientific community. Though relatively small, the cuts were magnified by their inclusion in a “stimulus budget” full of spending increases in other areas. The signal could not have been more negative for Canada’s researchers and their graduate students.   My colleagues and I launched the “Don’t Leave Canada behind” campaign and more than 2,500 researchers joined us in writing to the prime minister and to the leader of the opposition.

Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds | Leave a comment

NSERC sees researchers as out-source labour

NSERC announced two new programs as part of its “Strategies for Partnership and Innovation”. Engage grants are designed to cover direct project costs for up to 6 months and a total of $25,000, and Interaction grants are for $5,000 over three-months to help set up qualifying industry-academic partnerships.

More research opportunities you say, so what’s the problem?
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Welcoming MITACS to UBC

Honorable members of parliament, MLA, Mr. President, Friends and colleagues

Yes, I was involved in the founding of MITACS 10 years ago. I had the privilege to have fun doing it with Luc Vinet, Don Dawson, and Steve Halperin. They all wrote this morning nice comments to celebrate this wonderful occasion. I will not read them but you could all imagine how proud they all are of the state of MITACS today.

Continue reading

Posted in Honouring friends | Leave a comment

Honouring Nigel Lloyd

Ladies and Gentlemen, Messieurs Dames, Friends of Nigel Lloyd. My name is Nassif Ghoussoub and I am a friend of Nigel Lloyd.

Nigel: I have many messages from old friends of yours: Steve, Jacques, Luc, Don, and Arvind. The most urgent one is the following: Your retirement is NOT ACCEPTABLE TO US. We know that you’re kind of upset and jealous that you had to share lately Suzanne, Isabelle, and Janet with the minister of science and technology. But, as your old party-mate Mick said once: You can’t always get what you want.

Continue reading

Posted in Honouring friends | Leave a comment

Obama’s grandstanding for science

…… presents us with a problem but also with opportunities

Canada’s establishment is currently engaged in a raging and – in my opinion – healthy debate about the state of R&D in this country, its impact on the new economy and on post-modern societies, as well as on the role of government in supporting it. This debate was mostly triggered by the recently announced stimulus budget and the subsequent reactions, not the least of which being the March 16 “Don’t leave Canada behind” open letter to the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, A letter I have co-signed with more than 2200 of Canada’s leading researchers.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds | Leave a comment

Science et recherche : la vidéo qui oppose Sarkozy à Obama

Sarkozy et Obama n’ont pas exactement le même discours sur la recherche. C’est ce qu’un jeune chercheur a voulu démontrer en superposant deux de leurs interventions dans une vidéo postée sur YouTube. Le résultat : un président Obama offensif et remotivant, un président Sarkozy défensif et cherchant à diviser la communauté scientifique.

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

Obama’s speech to the US National Academy of Sciences

  • At such a difficult moment, there are those who say we cannot afford to invest in science. That support for research is somehow a luxury at a moment defined by necessities. I fundamentally disagree. Science is more essential for our prosperity, our security, our health, our environment, and our quality of life than it has ever been. And if there was ever a day that reminded us of our shared stake in science and research, it’s today.
  • We double the budget of key agencies, including the National Science Foundation, a primary source of funding for academic research.
  • We cannot allow our nation to fall behind.
  • I am here today to set this goal: we will devote more than three percent of our GDP to research and development. We will not just meet, but we will exceed the level achieved at the height of the Space Race.
  • Thank you all for your past, present, and future discoveries.

 
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | 2 Comments

A good old story of “curiosity-driven” research

“…. the great Michael Faraday, one of the giants that helped shape our modern understanding of electricity and magnetism. He was asked by the British Chancellor (Gladstone at the time) about what was the use of this electricity he was working on. His reply was “I do not know sir, but I wager that one day you will put a tax on it”.

Taken from the accidental mathematician.

Posted in R&D Policy | 1 Comment

Quand j’entends ça! J’ai très très mal

Here is a video  link to a famous speech on Research and Innovation by Sarkozy on January 22, 2009. French researchers were so humiliated that they were unified –including those who believed in reforming the system — in rejecting his plans.

Here is an open letter to the President by Fields medalist Wendelin Werner, published in Le Monde.

Posted in R&D Policy | Leave a comment

PIMS 10th Anniversary

Thanks Ed and thanks Arvind for your generous comments. It is always embarrassing to hear so much praise from two of the most unsung heroes of PIMS. With these two guys, I feel like I am a graduate student with an extremely generous supervisor: First they help in giving you your thesis subject, then they help you solve it, then they help you write it, then they work on your moral by praising you for achieving it.
Continue reading

Posted in Honouring friends | Leave a comment