Does the “I” in CFI really stand for “Innovation”?

Innovate

Is it the Canadian Foundation for Innovation or really the Canadian Foundation for Infrastructure? The modus operandi of the CFI has skewed university priorities and strained their finances, diverted provincial resources, put pressure on the NSERC and CIHR budgets to secure operating funds, while discriminating against entire disciplines and burdening researchers with red-tape. But it surely shines compared to the Knowledge Infrastructure Program (KIP) and things may be starting to change…
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy | 4 Comments

University governance: what does faculty representation mean?

The last elections for the faculty representatives on UBC’s Board of Governors triggered a legitimate debate about university governance. Should the University Act distinguish between rank-and-file faculty, from those faculty members who hold administrative positions?
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | 4 Comments

Hon. Ministers Clement and Goodyear, Please target this!

Your era at the helm of Canada’s national strategy for research and development, has been one of action, proactive leadership in research policy, tight management of federally funded programs, as well as increased and sustained support for certain research areas.

Indeed, we have been hearing a great deal lately about the targeting of Canada’s research effort towards government priorities, such as the Automobile of the 21st century, Bombardier, Pratt & Whitney and others.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy | 1 Comment

Cheer up mathematicians of the world

Tom Lehrer

Especially the young ones who never got to hear about Tom Lehrer.
Here is Lehrer’s Lobachevsky.

But don’t take him seriously about Lobachevsky. The guy was a genius.

In any case, what do you think of this quote?

“To copy from another is plagiarism.

To copy from more than one is research.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

If the “binning” of Canada’s scientists is here to stay, then here is a way to fix it!

NSERC has recently adopted a new evaluation system for its Discovery Grants. It relies on a “binning system”, that is based on a fragmented decision-making process. It has been widely criticized for its volatility, its lack of uniformity, and for its negative impact on early-career scientists, as well as on  universities with no or minimal graduate programs. Just in case the binning system is here to stay, we give a few easily implementable suggestions to improve the process.   The use of a slightly more involved non-linear formula may be necessary to help mitigate some of the described flaws.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy | 3 Comments

If Canada’s Academia is a monster, then what are education consultants?

What’s with all these Toronto-based consultants on higher education? They very probably never taught a class, let alone one with 600 students. They have definitely never carried out a major research project that took months and years of sweat and tears, and they have no clue how diverse and dynamic university’s curricula are and should be. Yet, they have “expert opinions” on all that, they have “supposedly credible” platforms to pontificate from, and they get paid for it.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds | 1 Comment

Gutsy statement by Robert Birgeneau

Earlier this week, Robert J. Birgeneau, former President of the University of Toronto and current Chancellor of the University of California at Berkeley, issued a surprisingly blunt and gutsy statement about the Arizona shootings. In a campus wide e-mail, he puts  the blame for the tragedies squarely on the “climate in which demonization of others goes unchallenged and hateful speech is tolerated”.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds | 2 Comments

No need for expert reviewers nor NSERC staff: Computer can run new binning system

A colleague –with experience on a selection committee– explains below why the new binning system may be announcing “very good days ahead for bad science”.

He makes 3 important points in his message below:

Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | 2 Comments

No students? Don’t bother apply for Discovery Grant

NSERC Discovery Grants II includes a discussion on the effect of the new “binning system” on the Discovery Grant Program.  I have received since many reports and opinions identifying and emphasizing various flaws in the system. There seems to be unanimity on the unfairness and danger of having the “Training of HQP” as such a determining criterium for grant eligibility –let alone size. The following and the next few posts will include –slightly edited for anonymity– contributions from various colleagues.
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | 2 Comments

NSERC responds (What took you so long?)

NSERC responded today to several of our older posts concerning their programs and policies. You can find their responses in the “Comments section”  following the posts in question (listed in reverse chronological order):

Posted in R&D Policy | 1 Comment

The R&D expert panel and the $7-billion that won’t buy much

A Government R&D review expert panel is working on figuring out why Canada lags behind many of its peers in capitalizing on research advances despite Ottawa’s $7-billion innovation budget. They are asking for input. Front line researchers are urged to come forward and not allow the shopkeepers and their privileged customers to monopolize the consultation process.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy | 11 Comments

What happened to the $8-million?

We reported earlier that in the 2010 federal budget, NSERC received a $13 million budget increase, $5-million of which were ear-marked for the Research Partnership Program (RPP). So, what did NSERC do with the remaining $8-million?
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | 2 Comments

Israeli-Palestinian Peace: UBC Admin. 1 – AMS 0

Last Saturday I attended a forum on “Building Peace between Israelis and Palestinians” at UBC’s Chan Centre. Kudos to the UBC Administration, and in particular to Stephen Owen, UBC’s Vice-President External and Legal, and his colleagues  for organizing such a civil and necessary forum in collaboration with the “Peace it Together” organization.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds | 2 Comments

Reality check on Canada’s doctoral graduates

First, we graduate too few of them. Secondly, they are snubbed by Canada’s private sector and thirdly, they end up south of the border longing to come back. (Thanks Eddy!)
Continue reading

Posted in R&D Policy | 3 Comments

“Concordia tente de calmer le jeu” but the faculty are showing signs of life

The Chair of the Board of Governors of Concordia University, Mr. Peter Kruyt, finally came out of hiding to declare that …. Concordia is aspiring to be one of the best universities in Canada, within 10 years. Fortunately, he didn’t say that it may take 10 different presidents to achieve that goal!
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | 1 Comment

Move over Hilbert, here comes DARPA

Would-be mathematicians learn about David Hilbert’s 23 problems way before they even learn how to ask someone for a first date. Presented by Hilbert at the International Congress of Mathematicians held in Paris in 1900, these problems stimulated mathematical research in the 20th century, and all but two have now been resolved in one way or another.
Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy | 1 Comment

“You get the Board you deserve”

What’s happening at Concordia University seems to be a live illustration of what Richard P. Chait was saying yesterday to a gathering of presidents at a Council of Independent Colleges conference in Palm Springs, California.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | Leave a comment

Before we lose sight of the question at hand

In view of the comments –public and private— about my post regarding the UBC Board’s governance, I am led to further clarify the issue intended to be up for debate.

Independently of the individuals involved, the FA letter has triggered a legitimate debate that we should have had a long time ago.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | 1 Comment

To the memory of two beautiful minds

On January 10, 2010, Sam Roweis, 37, an associate professor at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, jumped to his death from a 16th-floor balcony at his university-owned apartment.

Prior to teaching at NYU, Roweis was an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Toronto.
Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

While UBC’s Board is tested, others’ are running for cover

“Concordia is looking for a new president.  Salary is $350G and your chances of having to work out your term are close to zero”, tweeted Paul  Wells,

… and for La Presse, “Recteurs à Concordia: trois petits tours et puis s’en vont… avec leurs primes”.
Continue reading

Posted in Board of Governors | 1 Comment