Blog Stats
- 617,226 hits
-
Recent comments
Categories
- Banff International Research Station (26)
- Board of Governors (117)
- Honouring friends (57)
- Op-eds (183)
- R&D Policy (180)
- UBC Housing Action Plan (18)
- UBC Presidential Search (13)
- Uncategorized (67)
-
Recent Posts
- Head of UBC Mathematics: The end of an era
- Nicole Tomczak-Jaegermann 1945-2022
- UBC Campus Vision 2050, in a word, lacks vision
- Louis Nirenberg (1925-2020)
- UBC: The ill-fated revolt of those who ought to know better
- Shiny, happy, oblivious science
- NSERC has lost its bearings … again
- The Learning & Research of the UBC Board of Governors (II)
- The Learning & Research committee of the UBC Board: What a difference a year makes (I)
- UBC: Failures in governance are slowing down the pace of academic renewal
- A research community at the mercy of a leaderless NSERC
- A busy first four months on the UBC Board of Governors
- Academic publishing in the time of sanctions and boycotts
- Maurice Sion: 1927 – 2018
- Robert M. Miura: 1938 – 2018
- When the Walls of Governance Come Crumbling Down
- Why I am voting against the tuition increases for domestic students
- Resignation of the director of the Wall Institute: The reaction
- Why I am resigning from the directorship of the Wall institute
- Accountability and Governance at UBC: Budget
Archives
NGhoussoub
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweets
Author Archives: Ghoussoub
NSERC’s scholarships and fellowships: Policy shift or collateral damage?
The following comment to this blog got my attention: “I’m wondering if anyone else has noticed the most recent NSERC PGS (Post-Graduate Scholarships) and PDF (Post-Doctoral Fellowships) numbers: Across all disciplines from 2010 to 2011, Master’s awards are down 36%, … Continue reading
Posted in R&D Policy
12 Comments
“You cannot avoid the impression that science is for sale”
That was Michael Hartmer, director of the German Association of University Professors, commenting to Der Spiegel on the latest “textbook example of how not to manage the relationship between private industry and the academy”. A far cry from what was … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
2 Comments
When an Ottawa bureaucrat calls!
“Just so you know, I fund your organization, so when I tell you to do something, I expect you to do it”. No, this was not an elected official. Politicians normally know better than to say such things. That was … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds
Leave a comment
Sleepless in Taiwan
I am in Taipei for a mathematics conference in celebration of the 60th birthday of a great colleague, a superior scholar, an enriching scientific collaborator, and a dear friend, Chang-Shou Lin. What a treat it is to be here –notwithstanding … Continue reading
Posted in Honouring friends
1 Comment
“Decision-based evidence making” and the future of Canada’s scientific research
It’s official! “Our highest rated Discovery Grant researchers have a higher incidence of working with industry than their colleagues”. Thus spoke NSERC’s president Suzanne Fortier in her reply to the open letter by 331 mathematical scientists, including 27 Canada Research … Continue reading
Posted in R&D Policy
16 Comments
UBC to incentivize its own to live on the university land
In the next five days, I and a few other UBC governors and senior staff will be visiting NYU, Columbia, Harvard, UCLA, UC-Irvine and Stanford. Just like UBC, these universities are located in areas where housing prices are prohibitive. And … Continue reading
Posted in Board of Governors, UBC Housing Action Plan
8 Comments
Where is Discovery’s money going?
Treasury Board’s main estimates for 2011-12 were put out this week. On page 219 you will find the estimates for NSERC. Discover grants are scheduled to go up by $2M (less than 0.5% increase) while infrastructure will go down by … Continue reading
Posted in R&D Policy
2 Comments
A senior scholar reports on S. Fortier’s presentation at the CMS meeting
First there was the open letter to the industry minister by 327 mathematical scientists, including 27 Canada Research Chairs and 35 fellows of the Royal Society of Canada. Then came the public letter by 16 members of the Evaluation Group … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
5 Comments
When leaders disappoint … there is always poetry
“You should have been there to hear and counter the rhetoric about our self-inflicted failures”, one of several disappointed callers said after the presentation of NSERC’s President in Edmonton. Madame Fortier’s take-home message? It was the mathematicians problem: That $700K … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds
Leave a comment
Time to clean up the mess at the Discovery Grants program
NSERC’s President Suzanne Fortier will be making a presentation on June 03 at the Edmonton meeting of the Canadian Mathematical Society. The unexpected visit is undoubtedly related to the public letter by 16 members of the Evaluation Group 1508, which … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
1 Comment
Top 40 …pieces of mind
… in case you are wondering how many are following this blog and what are its most popular topics. It is somewhat depressing but understandable to see that our posts on NSERC’s new ways have been the most viewed (The most … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds
Leave a comment
16 NSERC panelists write to Suzanne Fortier about the 2011 Discovery Grants Competition
16 out of the 28 members of Evaluation Group 1508 (for Mathematics and Statistics) wrote the following letter to NSERC’s President Suzanne Fortier to “draw (her) attention to the distressing results of the 2011 Discovery Grants Program”. It is a … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
11 Comments
Why is the 2011 data on NSERC’s Discovery Grants so radioactive?
Two months after the end of the 2011 competition for Discovery Grants, NSERC is yet to release the full data on its outcome. The reason given is that there is a gov’t-wide hold on releasing data/making announcements. However, colleagues who … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
4 Comments
From MITACS to Mprime: Where do we go from here?
Canada’s mathematical sciences community currently faces many challenges. One that stands out particularly is the imminent elapse of the federal funding (about $5.4-million per year) for the MITACS Network of Centres of Excellence. This NCE currently supports 377 Canadian academic … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
4 Comments
A “Successful” NSERC Discovery Grant applicant replies to Isabelle Blain
Here is the reply of fellow mathematician, Greg Martin, to Isabelle Blain’s letter to the 2011 Discovery Grants applicants in mathematics and statistics (See below). There is also the open letter of Frithjof Lutscher.
Posted in Op-eds
4 Comments
How Alzheimer’s stole the things he loved: Mathematics and Music
Fields medalist Daniel Quillen died yesterday at the age of 70. Known for his role in developing higher algebraic K-theory, Quillen was, until 2006, a Professor of Pure Mathematics at Oxford. His wife of 50 years, Jean Quillen, sent this … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
NSERC should stick with linear thinking…and own principles
Dozens of mathematical and statistical scientists are currently signing an open letter to Tony Clement (Minister of Industry) and Suzanne Fortier (NSERC’s President). You can sign it here if you wish. No, this petition is not about the long-form census, … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds
Leave a comment
NSERC Discovery Grants: What do we know about the 2011 Math/Stats competition?
We are not used to see the normally confident scientists at the University of Toronto so agitated and angry at NSERC. Some of their mathematicians are screaming from the rooftops that the “NSERC Peer Review System is Broken for Mathematics“. … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
5 Comments
The good, the bad and the ugly in Tories Research Policy
Unlike the other parties, the Conservatives have now a 5-year track record on research policy. Their proposed 2011 budget may also be considered as their platform, at least for the short term. Their research policies are de-facto more detailed, hence … Continue reading
Posted in Op-eds, R&D Policy
4 Comments
