There are many puzzled, devastated, concerned and angry friends, colleagues and citizens wanting to learn about what happened at UBC last Friday evening. How can a promising energetic UBC president with far-reaching and refreshing ideas be led to resign after only 13 months in office. For many of them knew that Arvind Gupta is no quitter. This post is the first of a series about the spell that has befallen UBC.
It sure doesn’t look good when a university makes an announcement of such importance at the very end of a news cycle (Friday 2pm pacific, 5pm eastern!) in the midst of summer. Views may differ as to what constitutes the interest of a public university, but many of UBC’s stakeholders found the approach sneaky and underhanded. This is not a hedge-fund company folks. This is a university where an open and transparent process that ensures accountability and involvement by all is warranted.
But I wish it was the only blunder by UBC’s new caretakers surrounding this sad turn of events. There were many others.
John Montalbano, a recently retired executive at RBC Asset Management, who is currently the Chair of the Board, signed the announcement to faculty, students, and staff. Lindsay Gordon, a retired CEO of HSBC Canada and chair of HSBC Global Asset Management Canada Ltd., who has been Chancellor of UBC for a mere nine months, also signed it.
The optics of having two bankers with limited leadership experience in post-secondary education, appearing in complete control of UBC’s destiny at this delicate juncture of the university’s future is unfortunate. That they were abruptly announcing the departure of a faculty’s president, who has generated so much hope and expectations for resetting UBC towards academic excellence, was unsettling to many. To some, the event projected an unfortunate image of a ruthless bloodletting exercise that is rumoured to happen regularly in corporate boardrooms after a hostile take-over. Whether in corporatized universities or not, academic folks still prefer boring, but fair and orderly transitions within the normally decent traditions in university governance. “It’s all about the optics, stupid,” should have filled a banner adorning the halls of power at UBC.
The chair of the Board then decided to double down in a national paper, prompting Kris Olds to reply this morning in “Inside Higher Education”: “Make no mistake, this type of unexpected leadership transition is hugely significant. When Mr. Montalbano suggested in the Globe & Mail that a university president is de-facto as disposable as a Swiffer Duster, it made me wonder if something else is going on and if risks are being taken with the future of my alma mater.”
The lack of information and transparency in the announcement was not lost on anyone. “I’m perplexed by the lack of detail in the official communications about why and how the resignation occurred (which was not helped by a Friday afternoon release in middle of summer – note to Communications chief: bad timing idea!). All alumni like myself are left with is perusal of some speculative blog/media entries.”
Olds continues: “More worryingly, the communications approach demonstrates a lack of understanding about the power politics of leadership transitions, circa 2015, in an era where social media use can damage an institution’s reputation.”
He then refers to the similarity with the blunders at the University of Virginia. An important case, where the faculty rose, spoke up for the principles of shared governance, and succeeded to return the “resigned” president to her post. “…. The first lesson is that an early lack of transparency and full communications can heighten the risk of a major crisis erupting,” said Olds.
One senior colleague at UBC wrote about the announcement: “All this leaves me asking whether, as a faculty member, I am a “serf”—one of the humble toiling masses—whose opinion is unimportant, or who is deemed too primitive to engage in an informed dialogue about the course of the university’s future”.
But the mother of all gaffes is when the chair and the chancellor state: “We have strong academic leaders in our deans,” yet utter not a single word about the provost and the rest of the executive, who have been actively developing a bold strategic vision with Gupta, and who will undoubtedly be carrying the bulk of UBC responsibilities in the next little while.
We are simply astonished that such a statement was deemed essential, considering the rumour mills around campus (and in Jericho Tennis Club!) regarding the power struggle that was playing out between some of the deans and the central administration. The reasons for this showdown differ from mill to mill, whether you are at Mahoney’s or at Sage, but surely emphasize the necessity of having the non-academic caretakers of the university (and their sometimes naive government contacts) familiarize themselves with some of the history of North-American post-secondary education.
A well-known story is the one about Benjamin Ide Wheeler, who was President of the University of California for 20 years, from 1899 until 1919. Under his tenure, the Protestant college and the agriculture school evolved into the modern research university and the educational powerhouse that UC-Berkeley is today. But on his way to this historic achievement, Wheeler had to deal with a few bumps on the road.
The historian Henry F. May writes (see also William Warren Ferrier):“Knowing the fate of some of his predecessors and the University’s reputation as a president-eater, Wheeler demanded before he would accept the presidency, one last essential guarantee from the Board of regents: That the President should be in fact, as in theory, the sole organ of communication between the Deans and the Regents;
Wheeler made these demands because previous presidents had been victims of end runs by deans, especially from the College of Agriculture (there were no business schools then!), who would try to achieve their goals by appealing directly to the regents. The average tenure of previous presidents had been only four years, and the founding president, Daniel Coit Gilman only lasted two years before, frustrated by interference by the board, he resigned and went off to found Johns Hopkins University.
Jennifer Berdhal, a world expert on the role of race and gender in leadership, wrote that President Arvind Gupta may “have lost the Masculinity Contest among the leadership at UBC, as most women and minorities do at institutions dominated by white men.” And this may explain the real reasons behind the totally unexpected pushback I experienced when I ventured into this delicate subject a couple of months ago. I can easily imagine former president Stephen Toope in chorus with our culturally rich and diverse campus, wondering whatever happened to the core values of “Place and Promise,” that the Board and the Deans were supposed to uphold?
Let’s agree that there is no place for Masculinity Contests in our universities, neither is there any winner in irresponsible high-powered management games, where proper university governance is not practiced, and agreed-upon chains of command are not respected.
Lastly, I would like to emphasize that it is only the interest of UBC and of the whole Canadian post-secondary education system, which will be driving the discussions on this blog. And, as noted in today’s important message by the president of the UBC Faculty Association, many issues remain wide open.
Are we to investigate whether a massive system failure occurred or just accept the “we won’t miss a beat” statements of John Montalbano in the Globe?
Are the conditions, the practices, the personalities, the masculinity contests, or whatever drove Arvind Gupta to resign after only 13 months in office, systemic to this university? Can any president succeed if these malfunctions remain entrenched in our university’s nervous system?
In other words, is UBC in its current state governable? Only the whole truth can tell.
Thanks for posting this to cmath! The links are especially useful for more context. I wish him the best of luck in his future endeavors. University politics are crap at some places!
You are absolutely Right on the Masculinity and Corporate contest UBC is turning itself into. Who do these two retired Bankers think they are trying to run a great academic institution? UBC is on a downward spiral path if Gupta is not back at it . Removal of the Bankers is vital to reverse direction.
Thank you for putting into words what many of us feel. The board of governors made a decision which can have a potentially huge impact on all of us, without bothering to explain itself. Every faculty member I talk to is profoundly worried, yet the board chair seems to think that what they did will have zero impact on the university. How exactly are we expected to continue to trust them, given this disconnect?
As a UBC Engineering alumnus and a Fellow of five technical, professional and honorary bodies, I was impressed by the choice of Dr. Gupta as UBC’s President. His goals for UBC to become a top-ten University world-wide were inspirational. I believed that he could lead UBC’s excellent cohort of faculty and staff to achieve further greatness. Last Friday’s de facto assassination of Dr. Gupta’s career and his inspirational leadership capabilities are a disaster for UBC and all who have been inspired by him ion particular and UBC in general.
If the educational institutions are run like financial ones (stock market, Hedge funds), where the bottom line and the interest of corporate friends becomes more important than the spirit of learning and a place to evolve as a human being, then the faculty, students and ultimately the whole society are going to suffer. I am amazed to read here that the board has such a clout of the financial heads. A place of learning is not for making money, but to help make authentic human beings or leaders who learn to nurture their heart and the mind for a better society. Hope things work out at UBC for everyone in the near future.
One point which seems to be playing in the media, presumably generated by BOG related sources, is negative reporting on several VPs leaving shortly after Gupta took office. It is perhaps worth noting that me and other faculty around me welcomed these resignations with loud clapping. The VPs in question were corporate managers parachuted into a university environment, who made no effort to conform to or even pretend to respect the core tenants and foci of university environments – they were perceived as actively striving to convert UBC into a corporate top-down run entity whose sole focus is the bottom line.
The sudden resignation of Dr.Gupta is part of a pattern of interference by Corporate Sector on Instittutes of Higher Learning. Dr. Gupta is a brilliant academic. He was appoitned to head UBC after due dilligence and a proper search. If he is forced out in this secretative manner after only 13 months, then the Board of Governors are responsible. As an alumnus of UBC I demand that the Chair of the Board resign accepting culpability for this disgraceful episode whose only impact would be to tarnish the image of UBC.
As a member of the UBC Faculty, I completely agree with the sentiments expressed here.
It doesn’t augur well for the academic environment not just at UBC, but for higher education in the province as well as Canada, when one tries to transplant ideas and behavioural norms from an already discredited financial sector in administering a university. Arvind Gupta was like a much needed breath of fresh air when I listened to him speak about his vision for UBC at the Installation ceremony last year. President Arvind Gupta’s clarion call towards raising the bar for academic excellence at UBC resonated well with the Faculty who saw this also as an inspiration. A university needs a long term sustained vision rather than a short term selfish vision or imagined glory and one cannot help think of the following lines:
Psalms 37:21 The wicked borrow and never pay back, but good people are generous with their gifts.
One can only hope that this much needed generosity in disseminating knowledge and nurturing
excellence is not compromised in any way for other goals.
As an alumna of UBC and as a concerned citizen who cares about the Canadian post-secondary education, I am very disturbed by the sudden resignation of Dr. Gupta and I am not alone. Many in the community are beginning to ask the same question as the news is sinking in. It has tarnished UBC’s reputation. Let this be the beginning of the end of Montalbano’s chairmanship. People like him have no place in an educational institution.
Dr. Gupta is a brilliant academic, as well as a visionary leader. Under his leadership MITACS thrived. His resignation is a loss for UBC.
it is important that UBC takes a very deep look in the mirror and asks itself if it really is what it likes to believe it is . One must back up before President Gupta’s time and see the number of deans and VPs that left before their term ended. As you said in your other blog, either they do not know what they are doing hiring the wrong people or they hire the right people then fail to support them in effecting the change they were hired to create .
Tragic mistake from UBC Board of Governors. What a mess! Loss of an outstanding leader, and loss of direction, possibly for months or years. What is wrong at UBC? In the last 3 years an outstandingly good UBC Dean of Applied Science was also pressured into resigning, for reasons that were never made clear. Apparently UBC is not ready for visionary leaders who stick to principles of what is right and what is wrong. It appears that visionaries win the contest in the interview process but after appointment the “old boys club” running UBC finds they don’t want the vision after all!! As a taxpayer I am appalled at the waste of resources and effort.
Pingback: UBC: Undeveloped-Brain-Cs (by Adam Goodwin) | Adam Goodwin | Sports
From a perplexing story about a sudden resignation we now have what looks like a botched attempt to silence a senior star faculty member. The story is no longer simply a resignation. This is a full fledged attempt by a government appointee to try to minimize faculty academic freedom, to silence dissent, and to do so using some of the most hamfisted old fashion macho techniques imaginable.
If there was any doubt before, that doubt has evapourated. Mr. Montalbano you must resign and appologize for infringing upon the academic freedom of UBC Faculty.
Posted by Charles Menzies at 10:45 PM
Pingback: #UBC says Now is the Time to Speculate #ubcnews #highered #bced #caut
Pingback: #UBC says Now is the Time to Speculate #ubcnews #highered #bced #caut | Institute for Critical Education Studies
Pingback: UBC, WTF? | Whiteboard Workout